Peter Fajta vs Yaroslav Demin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Second serve performance in recent form:

In the past six months, Fajta has demonstrated a commendable prowess on their second serve, winning an impressive 52.54% of points, while Demin has managed to secure 46.71%. This particular statistic holds significant influence over match prediction accuracy.

Return game statistics in recent form:

Recent return game statistics showcase Fajta's dominance, as they have triumphed in 52.16% of their opponents' second serve points. Meanwhile, Demin stands strong with a success rate of 52.76%. When it comes to first serve returns, Fajta maintains a respectable 30.87%, while Demin slightly outshines with 32.83%. These numbers serve as crucial indicators to determine the favored competitor in this head-to-head matchup.

Analyzing performance under pressure:

In terms of saving breakpoints, Fajta has exhibited remarkable resilience, preserving 68.54% of these crucial points in recent matches. Conversely, Demin has shown a solid performance, saving 64.35%. This statistic proves invaluable when it comes to making in-game betting predictions.

Performance overview:

Over the past year, Fajta has displayed exceptional prowess, winning 64.71% of matches played (44 wins and 24 losses), whereas Demin has achieved a commendable 54.55% (30 wins and 25 losses). These overall head-to-head figures provide an insightful overview for match predictions.

Preferred playing surface:

Fajta has exhibited their highest career surface win percentage of 73% on indoor hard courts (16 wins and 6 losses), while their least successful surface is clay, with a win percentage of 61% (88 wins and 57 losses). On the other hand, Demin finds their greatest success on hard courts, achieving a win percentage of 55% (35 wins and 29 losses), while clay courts prove to be their weakest surface, with a win percentage of 38% (9 wins and 15 losses).

Player level:

In the past year, Fajta has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, delivering an impressive win percentage of 65.67% (44 wins and 23 losses). Comparatively, Demin has also competed primarily in similar tournaments, securing a win percentage of 63.04% (29 wins and 17 losses). When assessing each player's stats to determine the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative levels of the events they have participated in.

Opponent quality statistics:

Within the last 12 months, Fajta has faced opponents with an average ranking of 81.65, whereas Demin has challenged players with an average ranking of 201.13. These numbers shed light on the caliber of opponents each player has encountered, influencing their match predictions.

Deciding set performance:

If this match extends to a deciding set, Fajta has exhibited a solid record of winning 38% of deciding sets in the past year. Meanwhile, Demin boasts an impressive success rate, triumphing in 53% of all matches played on the tour. These stats prove valuable for live predictions and betting opportunities.

Current event head-to-head stats:

While historical player performance provides useful insights for predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to consider current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. To access the most up-to-date information, please refer to the section below (if applicable, depending on whether they have competed in the current event). Additionally, it is important to acknowledge that certain players may excel under specific event conditions, and this factor should be taken into account when predicting the match outcome.

Break point conversion:

In recent matches, Fajta has displayed an impressive ability to convert 46.63% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Demin proves to be a formidable opponent, converting 45.19% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic holds significant relevance when engaging in live betting and seeking critical insights during breakpoint situations.

If you have an affinity for statistical analysis and are interested in predictive models for tennis matches, you may find this article a valuable resource (Warning: Suitable for avid statistics enthusiasts).